Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 4:39 pm
Marketing Scouting
Andrew asked me to bring this over from the Wiggio board...this is a copy of the post that I put up there a week and a half ago, but which got buried amongst the other topics.
YIS
Steve Bobrowicz
Thunder Bay
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi there everyone;
I've just joined this group...Thanks to Garth for putting me on to it...
You might recognize my name from the Leader and Scouting Life magazines...I've written all the history articles over the past couple of years. All the background reading that I've had to do for those articles has been interesting and a lot of fun, but I think that I've gained some interesting insights as to why Scouting was so big "back in the day", which might point us to some partial solutions for our membership issues today.
Keep in mind just how big Scouting was...at our peak through the fifties and early sixties, Boy Scouts of Canada had enrolled between ten and twenty percent of eligible youth in the country. And you have to keep in mind that the definition of "eligible youth" was a lot smaller then...there were no Beavers, and there were no girls involved.
So what has happened? There has been a lot of finger-pointing in the last twenty years; everybody seems to want a single reason for the decline, whether it be video games or competition from other clubs, or the uniform. But if you compare us to other western countries (USA, UK), membership is not delining in those countries; in fact, it's growing. On a per capita basis, youth membership in the States outnumbers us ten to one, and it's about four to one in the UK. They've got just the same issues of video games and uniforms in those countries. But let's face it...there are a multitude of reasons that our membership has declined. Some of them we may be able to address, some may be beyond our control.
But you know what? Things weren't a whole lot different a hundred years ago. When Scouting was new, we took a lot of ridicule from the public at large, and a lot of that ridicule might sound familiar...what silly uniforms (keep in mind that people didn't wear shorts in 1909), it's too militaristic (BP was a famous general of course), young people can't take a responsible role, etc...
So what was different then?
Baden-Powell.
B-P's brilliancy was not in creating Scouting (there were many similar organizations at the time), but in marketing it. He was always an incredibly charismatic man; and after Mafeking he became a national celebrity with many incredibly influential friends.
The popular version of our history is that B-P wrote his book and that Scouting just sort of blossomed on its own. That's nonesense. B-P started marketing Scouting in 1906, well before Brownsea Island, well before Scouting for Boys. He published a pamphlet called 'The Boy Scouts Scheme' in 1906, and lectured on the topic extensively...to educators, to church people, to politicians, and anyone else who would listen.
After Scouting for Boys was published, he continued the publicity with an world-wide lecture tour (he came to Canada and the USA in 1910), follow-up books, a prototype Jamboree in London in 1909, and recruited powerful and influential men to push Scouting as well. The most important of these was the King's brother, the Duke of Connaught, who became the President of the Boy Scouts Association, from 1909 until he died in 1942 (he was also Governor General of Canada 1911-1916, and our second Chief Scout). In Canada, B-P recruited Lord Strathcona (Google him), who provided organizational, financial, and publicity support for Scouting.
And of course there were the Chief Scouts for the Overseas Dominions. B-P didn't just ask the Governor General of Canada to be our Chief Scout...he did the same in all the British Dominions. And in the early years, the G-G was more than just an honourary figurehead for Scouting...they actively promoted the Movement and had a hand in its development. Lord Byng of Vimy (G-G 1921-26) inspected Scout Troops whenever he toured the country, and even held Woodbadge courses right in Rideau Hall!
So, what does that mean today?
Marketing...
The biggest reason that I see in our decline is that, for a long time, Scouting was so big and so well known that we didn't NEED any marketing. Everybody in Canada knew what Scouting was about. However, we're now at a point where we have two generations, both the kids and their parents, who know very little of what Scouting is about.
We need recognizable faces, famous people, influential names, to trumpet Scouting for us in the same way that the Duke of Connaught did a hundred years ago. We need to go back to B-P's drawing board and pitch Scouting not only to kids, but to their parents, to educators, churches and politicians. But also important, we need to tailor the pitch to the audience.
B-P once said "So with boys, if you try to preach to them what you consider elevating matter, you won't catch them. Any obvious 'goody-goody' will scare away the more spirited among them, and those are the ones you want to get hold of." I think this holds as true today as in 1908. I love the "Creating a Better World" campaign, and think it's a wonderful marketing theme to put to parents and educators, but I don't think it's the right pitch to attract the youth who want to go camping, hiking, and canoeing. THOSE are the activities that we're trying to sell, THOSE are the things that are going to attract new youth to the Movement. We'll worry about having them change the world after they sign up.
I think that's enough for my first posting. Have a great weekend.

