Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:54 pm
Aging, unfortunately, you have huge challenge ahead of you, but read on, because there is a solution.
So much of what is important in Scouting cannot be done with only 5 Scouts (and that is your best case). Patrol competitions and most wide games are impossible. Less obvious is the fact that smaller troops lack a feeling of vibrancy. Think about how it would feel to be at an NHL game if there were only five people in the stands. Young people are group-sensitive: If it feels like only five people are interested in Scouts, how can it be cool? This will effect your retention even if the Scouts say they are enjoying Scouts.
Establishing patrol leadership is another huge challenge. New Scouts need experienced PLs to look up to and to learn from. Three years from now, you may have some third-year Scouts to be PLs, but they won't have grown up with older Scouts as role models. It takes six years minimum before you can have a PL who went through Scouts with third-year role models.
Without experienced Scouts to train the new Scouts in their skills, Scouting activities end up being far more adult-driven than they should be at the troop level. The Scouts get accustomed to this and it is difficult to train them to take responsibility for themselves. Most skill training should be Scout to Scout.
I know it is difficult when you are the only troop in your city. However, New Hamburg is close enough to KW that you can partner with an existing troop. There are many ways to do this and some will work better than others. With only a handful of Scouts, all new, I suggest fully integrating yourself with the other troop. Continue to partner until you have at least 12 Scouts in New Hamburg.
My troop is on the western side of Waterloo and you would be welcome to partner with us. Please contact me if you are interested. There may also be suitable troops in western Kitchener.
I hope you won't be offended by what I am writing. I want Scouting to be successful. No amount skill or hard work can make up for just not having enough people.