Thu Apr 16, 2009 12:51 pm
Andrew: We'll take anybody who cares. Long term I'd even like our program to be a recruiting tool INTO senior sections (crazy, I know!). I'm even pushing for a way to get some Guides onto the courses. I agree entirely with your "seeing things first hand" comment:
ANYBODY WHO IS READING THIS PLEASE KNOW THAT YOU ARE WELCOME TO COME AND OBSERVE OR PARTICIPATE.
Mark: No, I wouldn't consider a WB-I course an SIT course unless it was specifically designed to meet the needs of the Senior Venturers/Junior Rovers. These participants bring a TON of stuff to the table that most adults taking the courses do not because they have grown up with the program and are still living the program. The way they interact with the youth will be totally different and so will their role within the leadership team. Chances are they will still be participating in a Venturer/Rover program and this needs to be taken into account/supported/encouraged as well. I haven't seen the Chinook Course in action, but my understanding is that they do something like this with their course.
I agree with your assessment that the goal of an SIT program is to give them skills so that they can effectively deliver a program to the youth within the sections that they are working with. Now, just what are those skills...
Clearly many of these are covered in a WB-I course. Knowing who section aged youth are, proper way to carry out an opening, badge program review, paperwork, etc. These are the skills that we believe define our section leaders. In a WB-II course we take this even further covering things like advanced ceremonies, volunteer recruitment and development, advanced risk management, etc. These are the skills that we believe define our senior section leaders. All important skills and all skills that we expect our adult section leaders to have. Should we expect our SITs to have this same set of skills? I don't think so, not unless we (mistaenly) think that the role that they play in a section leadership team is the same as every other leader. In 99% of cases I don't think that a given 16-17 year-old would want these roles and all the administration that goes along with it. So, what do they want? What skills do they need? What does Scouting need from them?
We built HEROES around answering these questions. One thing that became clear was that they did NOT need a WB-I (although many people thought that they did, including some of our potential participants). At the end of our searching we decided to target the course at providing only one thing through multiple avenues: a vision of Scouting as a life changing and world changing movement and to let them experience/participate in that change. There are lots of places where section programming is touched on or reviewed, but sessions like "badge program" were ultimately back burnered for more important things like "Working With Adults" or giving them the opportunity to develop and practice their own programming (like themed campfires). It's a split between the survival skills necessary to make it in a world of (misplaced?) adult expectations and reminding them how to play so that they can bring, nay, BE the magic of the program. At the end of the day they'll get the nuts and bolts of being a traditional "adult" section leader through mentorship with the other section leaders and in WB-I or II courses if they stick around long enough to take them. It is our hope that this course gives them that reason. To achieve this we've packed the course with lots of opportunities for participants to discover the vision of Scouting and find their place in it so that they can go home and share the vision they have constructed with others.
This said, there are going to be LOTS of changes to this year's course cuz I don't think we've got the method right just yet. Feedback so far is that the vision is bang on though.
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit." ~Aristotle